8.2. Key challenges and policy implications 464. Across the range of instruments analysed, the report underlines common obstacles for the S...
8.2. Key challenges and policy implications 464. Across the range of instruments analysed, the report underlines common obstacles for the SME sector to fully reap the benefits of a more diversified financial offer. For policy makers and stakeholders, addressing these challenges is crucial if the increasingly complex financial system is to serve the needs of the real economy. 465. First, SME skills and strategic vision are a key ingredient to any effort to broaden the range of financing instruments. The limited awareness and understanding about alternative instruments on the part of start-ups and SMEs have limited the development of these markets.
It is not only a matter of increasing knowledge about individual instruments, but also supporting SMEs in developing a long-term strategic approach to business financing, that is, understanding how different instruments can serve their different financing needs at specific stages of the life cycle, the different advantages and risks implied, and the complementarities and possibility to leverage these sources. 466. It is also necessary to improve the quality of start-ups’ business plans and SME investment projects, especially for the development of the riskier segment of the market. In many countries, a major impediment to the development of equity finance for young and small businesses is the lack of “investorready” companies. Furthermore, SMEs are generally ill-equipped to deal with investor due diligence requirements. Indeed, an increasing concern about the lack of entrepreneurial skills and capabilities and low quality of investment projects is driving more policy attention to the demand side, although supplyside policies are still prevalent. This includes measures such as training and mentoring.. 467. The regulatory framework is a key enabler for the development of instruments that imply a greater risk for investors than traditional debt finance, from asset-based finance to equity financing. Thus,
designing and implementing effective regulation, which balances financial stability, investors’ protection and the opening of new financing channels for SMEs, represents a crucial challenge for policy makers and regulatory authorities. This is especially the case given the rapid evolution in the market, resulting from technological changes as well as the engineering of products that, in a low interest environment, respond to the appetite for high yields by financiers. New financing models are emerging that may engage relatively inexperienced investors, such as in the case of crowdfunding, or in which the misalignment of incentives may place at risk the stability of the system, which is made more vulnerable to risk by an increased interconnectedness of financial markets. 468. Securitisation is a case in point in this regard. Recent regulatory initiatives address pitfalls brought to the fore during the global financial crisis, such as the misalignment of interests between originators and investors and of regulatory capital with credit risk, as well as the lack of due diligence by investors. However, regulatory reforms intended to make the financial sector safer are perceived to be unduly onerous by many investors, who are withdrawing from the market. Also, the lasting uncertainty arising from expected regulatory revisions creates disincentives to investors and hampers the re-launch of the market (OECD, 2014a). Certainty is part of a sound regulatory framework for investors. 469. Also, efforts should be made to foster the wider use of public equity for SMEs,
which is currently held back by high costs, regulatory burdens, lack of liquidity and trading practices that create disincentives for intermediaries. The right balance between administrative and regulatory burden and due diligence needs to be achieved, so that the flexibility provided to SMEs does not compromise investor protection, integrity of market participants, corporate governance or transparency. It is important for policy makers to incentivise capital market participants to take a longer-term approach, and offer additional services to growth-oriented entrepreneurs. Creating the right ecosystem for public equity for SMEs will also support the development of other, non-traditional SME equity instruments such as equity private placements, equity crowdfunding, listed funds (with potential co-funding and risk sharing between the private and public sectors), and corporate venturing. 470. Addressing information asymmetries and increasing transparency in the markets are other priorities to boost the development of alternative financing instruments for SMEs. Information infrastructures for credit risk assessment, such as credit bureaux or registries or data warehouses with loanlevel granularity, can reduce the risk perceived by investors when approaching SME finance and help them identify investment opportunities. Reducing the perceived risk by investors may also help reduce the financing costs which are typically higher for SMEs than for large firms. The higher risks and costs stem from the large heterogeneity and opacity of the SME sector, with entrepreneurs often less prone, willing or able to share risk-sensitive information (OECD, 2006; OECD 2014a).
471. In some countries, policies seek to address the information gap between SMEs and potential investors by facilitating their direct interaction, with different degrees of public engagement, from awareness campaigns to brokerage and match-making. In the business angel market, for instance, public action has largely aimed at improving information flows and networking opportunities between financiers and entrepreneurs. In some cases, however, the facilitation efforts have not produced the desired results, due to the lack of maturity of local markets, i.e. little scale or lack of investor-ready companies. This further highlights the need for a policy mix that takes into account existing limitations on both the supply and the demand side.
472. For some hybrid or equity instruments, policy makers also face the challenge of kick-starting the offer for SMEs, or extending it to SMEs with lower credit ratings and smaller financial needs than those usually served by private investors, while ensuring long-term sustainability. In the aftermath of the global financial crisis, as private investors withdrew from some market segments, public policies have also aimed at sustaining these markets, with governments stepping in to fill, at least in part, the financing gap for innovative or growth-oriented enterprises. As a result, the public share of funding in these higher risk segments has significantly increased.
A key challenge now is to leverage private resources and develop appropriate risk-sharing mechanisms with private partners. 473. In spite of their growing importance for financiers and SMEs, evidence on the use of these various tools by SMEs, and how they respond to their needs, is currently patchy. The lack of hard data on non-debt financing instruments represents an important limitation for the design, implementation and assessment of policies in this area. This limitation is particularly critical when seeking to take account of SME heterogeneity in the process of policy design. Micro data and micro level analysis are essential to improve understanding about the different needs of the SMEs sector and may help to better understand the potential and challenges of new business models emerging in the financial sector.
References Achleitner A-K., Bock C. and Watzinger M. (2011), The Capital Gains Tax: A Curse but also a Blessing For Venture Capital Investment, Center for Entrepreneurial and Financial Studies Working Paper No. 2011-04. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1939844 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1939844 ADB and OECD (2014), ADB-OECD Study on Enhancing Financial Accessibility for SMEs. Lessons from Recent Crises, Asian Development Bank and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, available at http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/adb-oecd-study-enhancing-financialaccessibility-smes.pdf Ashcroft J. (2011), Credit Easing and the creation of SME bonds: a possible solution, Note from Dr John Ashcroft to Sir Howard Bernstein, November, 2011, www.johnashcroft.co.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2012/06/Credit-Easing-and-SME-bonds.pdf Bartoli F., Ferri G., Murro P. and Rotondi Z. (2010), “What's special about banking in Italy? Lending Technologies, Complementarity, and Impact of Soft Information”, in G. Bracchi and D. Masciandaro (eds.), “Nuovi equilibri in finanza: le banche, le imprese e lo stato”, The XV Report on Financial System, Italian Banking Association. Baygan G. (2003), “Venture capital policies in Israel”, STI Working Paper 2003/3, OECD, Paris Beck T. and Dermirguc-Kunt A. (2006), “Small and medium-size enterprises: Access to finance as a growth constraint”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 30, Issue 11, pp. 2931-2943 Beck T., Dermirguc-Kunt A., Maksimovic V. (2004), “Financing patterns around the world: the role of institutions”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No 2905, World Bank, Washington D.C. Belleflamme P., Lambert T. and Schwienbacher A. (2011), “Crowdfunding: tapping the right crowd”, CORE Discussion Paper 2011/32, Centre for Operations Research and Econometrics, Universite Catholique de Louvain. Belleflamme P. , Lambert T. and Schwienbacher A. (2012), “Individual crowdfunding practices”, Working Paper 2012/02, Louvain School of Management Research Institute, www.uclouvain.be/cps/ucl/doc/iag/documents/WP_2012_02_Lambert_Th.pdf Benchaya G. and Anderson G. (2010), “The true face of dilution”, ABF Journal, January/February, accessible at http://abfjournal.com/articles/the-true-face-of-dilution-part-i/ Berger A.N. and Black L.K. (2011), “Bank size, lending technologies, and small business finance”, Journal of Banking & Finance 35, pp. 724-735 Berger A.N. and Udell G.F. (2006), “A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance”, Journal of Banking & Finance 30, pp. 2945-2966 Berger A.N. and Udell G.F. (2002), “Small business credit availability and relationship lending: The importance of bank organizational structure”, Economic Journal 112, F32-F35 Berger A.N. and Udell G.F. (1998), “The Economics of Small Business Finance: The Roles of Private Equity and Debt Markets in the Financial Growth Cycle”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 22
No comments